Yesterday we considered the idiocy of postponing your career in an effort to “find your passion.”
The popular attitude is that if you do something you are passionate about then it will lead to success.
Of course, that depends on how you define success.
Most people believe that if they are successful they will also be happy.
Coincidentlly, a large percentage of them have also bought into the current attitude that equates success with money.
So it comes as a major surprise to many who have achieved financial success to discover they still aren’t happy.
Rather than my opinions, I thought you would find these stories more enlightening.
First, an unhappy $150K a year millennial woman at 26 to happy single momhood and $50K five years later.
I realized that higher pay didn’t equate to a better job fit for me. I do know that at the end of the day, life is so much richer than the number on your tax form — and that’s a lesson that’s priceless.
Not that there is anything wrong with financial success.
Ed Schweitzer moved his company into the future decades ago and has already accomplished in terms of good jobs what Washington claims it’s going to do by turning back the clock.
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, a manufacturer of sophisticated equipment for the global power industry based in Pullman, WA, solved its people problem internally.
While others outsource, Schweitzer goes DIY. While others establish a tightly focused definition of work history and skills they’re looking for, Schweitzer focuses on fundamentals: “I like to hire smart people with good values and strong fundamental education,” says founder Ed Schweitzer, who started the company in his basement 35 years ago. Today, it employs just over 5,000 and has revenue of nearly $1billion.
Schweitzer also set the company up as an ESOP, meaning it’s employee-owned.
Even in Silicon Valley, maximizing financial success isn’t everyone’s preferred road, like Craig Newmark — the Craig in Craig’s List.
“Basically I just decided on a different business model in ’99, nothing altruistic,” he said. “While Silicon Valley VCs and bankers were telling me I should become a billionaire, I decided no one needs to be a billionaire — you should know when enough is enough. So I decided on a minimal business model, and that’s worked out pretty well. This means I can give away tremendous amounts of money to the nonprofits I believe in … I wish I had charisma, hair, and a better sense of humor,” he added in a completely deadpan voice. “I think I could be far more effective.”
When enough is enough.
A quaint concept by today’s standards.
Read the stories.
Think about them.
Then create your own definition of success—what you want, not what you’re supposed to want.
Image credit: Ron Mader