Home Leadership Turn Archives Me RampUp Solutions Option Sanity
 


  • Categories

  • Archives
 

Ducks in a Row: the Dichotomy of Absolutes

by Miki Saxon

ducks_in_a_rowI read a great post by Jennifer Miller on the ubiquity of ‘perfect’ in descriptions and the dangers of embedding perfection as a goal in corporate culture.

It reminded me that ‘perfect’ and ‘perfection’ are right up there with ‘leader’ and ‘leadership’ on the overused/abused scale—more, actually, since they represent a condition beyond human abilities.

Humans don’t do absolutes particularly well.

They do better on a strictly personal level when they have absolute control over all parts of the equation, but even then their score leaves much to be desired—just consider the infidelity statistics.

Add to that the fact that the standards themselves are a moving target. Even those that seem to be absolute, like murder, have a definition that changes with societal attitudes towards what constitutes a victim.

Since humans so often fall short of perfection, society and corporations codify the definitions to make it easier to adhere to them. That’s especially important when it comes to ethical stances, which is why condoning deviations, as described yesterday, is so devastating to the organization.

The take-away is simple: never establish goals that set you or your people up for failure.

If you are prone to talking in absolutes, “we will always…” here is a simple rule to guide you.

“We will always” is acceptable if you are discussing well defined intangibles, such as ethics and values that apply equally to everyone in the organization, but isn’t applicable in setting tangible goals, such as quality rules for defects.

Flickr image credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zedbee/103147140/

Your comments-priceless

Don’t miss a post! Subscribe via RSS or EMAIL

2 Responses to “Ducks in a Row: the Dichotomy of Absolutes”
  1. Jennifer V. MillerNo Gravatar Says:

    Miki,

    Thanks for the shout-out and I agree– we humans don’t do “absolutes” very well at all. There is so little in life that IS absolute. Yet, we continue to insist on making everything fit neatly into some category.

    I confess to being guilty of that sometimes as well….

  2. Miki SaxonNo Gravatar Says:

    Hi Jennifer, I think we all do it at times.

    Perhaps it’s fear that leads people to force things into neat categories yielding a (false) sense of control over them; also, absolutes eliminate the need to think. Not to mention ideologies—where would they be without them?

    Thanks for stopping by.

Leave a Reply

RSS2 Subscribe to MAPping Company Success

Enter your Email




Powered by FeedBlitz

wasting-stock

Let Miki REwrite for you

About Miki View Miki Saxon's profile on LinkedIn

About Matt View Matt Weeks's profile on LinkedIn


CheatSheet for InterviewERS

CheatSheet for InterviewEEs™

Have a quick question or just want to chat?

Feel free to write or call me at 360.335.8054

Great ways to get rid of the kinks, break the logjam or juice your creativity!

Creative mousing

Bubblewrap!

Animal innovation

Brain teaser

Disasters keep on coming, donate what you can whenever you can

The following accept cash and in-kind donations: Doctors Without Borders, UNICEF, Red Cross, World Food Program, Save the Children

Web site development: NTR Lab
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
Make Money Blogging