Home Leadership Turn Archives Me
 


  • Categories

  • Archives
 

More about the tenacity of cyber stuff

by Miki Saxon

In August I wrote Like diamonds, cyber-stuff is forever, ending it with the comment, “Your little corner of the world in cyberspace includes the past, present and future…”

More proof stacked up this last week, and it’s far more worrying than the self-postings that are (somewhat) mitigated by claims of youth and/or naiveté.

Far more serious is Expunged Criminal Records Live to Tell Tales, on October 17th, that shines a spotlight on the fact that records from the justice system have a life of their own, “The problem often arises,” said Ms. Rodriguez-Taseff, the Miami lawyer, “because so many agencies have access to criminal records… Even though you have an expunged record, oftentimes a policing agency or a corrections facility allows private entities to gain access to it.”

As with resume and credit databases, once entered, data seems to migrate with a life of it’s own—ask anyone who has tried to remove their resume or straighten out incorrect credit info, let alone clean up identity theft.

And on the 21st came A Student’s Video Résumé Gets Attention (Some of It Unwanted), telling how a the video accompanying a resume was apparently leaked by someone inside UBS, and spun out of control across the web and into the real world. The applicant says “… he may have lost his chance to work on Wall Street, and added that he may not succeed in securing a financial job at all.”

So, what does all this mean to individuals and business? A lot, but here are what I see as the four main points.

  • There needs to be far more education of users regarding the lack of privacy and the migration of data—and it needs to be done in compelling, easily understood terms.
  • Companies need to rethink where to draw the line when evaluating background checks.
    • Does it matter a decade or more later that someone did wild things in high school?
    • If so, which things matter?
    • How should the intervening “good behavior” be weighted?
    • Whose responsibility is it to double-check the checkers?
  • Companies must strengthen internal confidentiality. It takes very little to ruin a street rep and breaking candidate trust is one of the fastest. Those that don’t assure confidentiality can look forward to the duel results of
    • far fewer candidates to choose from; and
    • more legal difficulties from those that are leaked.
  • Based on the power of the lobbying interests, waiting for any kind of solutions from Washington is likely a waste of time.

Whatever happens in years to come, it’s certainly going to prove interesting, to say the least.

Your comments-priceless

Don’t miss a post! Subscribe via RSS or EMAIL

Sphere: Related Content

6 Responses to “More about the tenacity of cyber stuff”
  1. Scott AllenNo Gravatar Says:

    The argument I hear from many young people, and which honestly, I feel a bit myself, even at 40, is, “Would I even want to work for a company that wouldn’t hire me because some of my college antics were caught on video?”

    Our last two U.S. Presidents (Bush and Clinton) I’m sure did a lot of stuff in their high school and college days that they wouldn’t want preserved on video for all posterity. We can’t hold it against them forever now just because there are more witnesses.

  2. MikiNo Gravatar Says:

    Ah, but it is held against them, whether it’s accurate or not.

    Videos can be rigged and much of cyber-information is inaccurate. Companies rarely check the validity/veracity of what’s found in background checks, choosing to err on the side of caution—since that doesn’t hurt them.

  3. MAPping Company Success Says:

    [...] I’ve commented several times in the past that “stuff” in cyberspace will never go away, and, more recently, that expunged court records often aren’t [expunged] and confidential information does get leaked. [...]

  4. MAPping Company Success Says:

    [...] For those with whom More about the tenacity of cyber stuff resonated, here’s a brief update on what ChoicePoint has done to address the leaky sieve they called their security. Too bad that other’s aren’t following their lead. [...]

  5. MAPping Company Success Says:

    [...] No longer “In perpetuity” has taken on a whole new meaning. [...]

  6. MAPping Company Success Says:

    [...] written several times regarding how stuff posted online will never go away—no matter what you do, and the impact this has/will have—especially on your professional [...]

Leave a Reply

Donate to Haiti Earthquake Relief NOW

The following are accepting cash and in-kind donations: UNICEF (1-800-4UNICEF), Direct Relief, Yele Haiti, Partners in Health, Red Cross, World Food Program, Mercy Corps (1-888-256-1900), Save the Children, Lambi Fund, Doctors Without Borders, The International Rescue Committee, Care, William J. Clinton Foundation

The following organizations are accepting SMS donations in the US only:

  • SMS text “HAITI” to 90999 to donate $10 to Red Cross relief efforts
  • SMS text “YELE” to 501501 to Donate $5 to Yele Haiti’s Earthquake Relief efforts
  • SMS text "GIVE10" to 20222 to donate $10 to Direct Relief

Help map Haiti - Directly assist relief workers in saving lives.

RSS2 Subscribe to MAPping Company Success

Enter your Email

Powered by FeedBlitz

Let Miki REwrite for you

About Miki View Miki Saxon's profile on LinkedIn

About Jim View Miki Saxon's profile on LinkedIn

Have a quick question or just want to chat?

Feel free to write or call me at 866.265.7267.

Up to a point it's free, beyond that point it's business. Not sure? No problem:) I'll say something if the line's crossed.

Great ways to get rid of the kinks, break the logjam or juice your creativity!

Creative mousing

Bubblewrap!

Animal innovation

Brain teaser

Mind Munchies

Web site development: NTR Lab
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License.